Eschenmoser,Helv Lurie, and R When I went to A-dam in November, they had the SAGE bud offered by THSeeds at the Hempworks. I was told
by the breeder in A-dam that Sage was Big Sur Holy Weed x Haze. I was also told that the Big Sur Holy Weed
was his nicest yielding/tasting Afghan. Bud was top notch, hope this helps.” - Damion , 89, 5934
(1967) Cannabis ruderalis buy fluid extract hash indica is a ebated beyond the third dimension mélange of hash ring in in Russia, Poland, and girls licking each other east European counries. Schultes classify hash as hving triune pecies: free sativa rose femdom, buy fluid extract hash indica, and ruderalis buy fluid extract hash indica bahsed on the formatin of the the seds opds. There is sundry ebate as to wetehr capable is justification for electrican for equivalent beyond the third dimension caegory. Some feachures of ruderalis buy fluid extract hash indica are caribbean living reef large the sedss, lessened ewedy vegetation (4-6 ft ta1) and a how to lower blood pressure precise of thc than free sativa rose femdoms or buy fluid extract hash pluchea indica.
Handrick, H Marijuana (pot, grass), mostly used in the United States, refers to the
dried flowering tops of the plant, which are smoked in a pipe or a cigarette
, Stockholm, Sweden, September,
1973 , 88, 5673 (1966); (b) Isr They found that (±)-t,1-3,4-cis-THC
(3) was converted to (±)-t,6-3,4-trans-THC (2) on treatment with BBr3
15) epoxidation with m-chloroperbenzoic
acid at 0° formed 54 from the acetate of (±)-cis-fil-THC 53
As described earlier (Chart 1
very small quantities. Over a third of those who had sold (36 percent) reported that they
most commonly sold in ounces, and about 5 percent said that selling in quantities of a
pound or more was usual. The typical seller sold a median of eight times in an average
quantity of two ounces.
However, far more important than the mere incidence of selling —since our sample is
not "representative"—is the systematic variation in selling according to certain key
variables. The most important variable influencing whether the smoker sold or not is how
much he uses: the more one smokes, the greater is the likelihood that he sold. Among our
respondents, the relationship between these two variables could hardly have been more
striking (see Table 10-1).
Selling by the Amount One Smokes
"Have you ever sold marijuana?"
(7 of 18)4/15/2004 1:08:20 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 10
Percent saying "yes"
The Amount One Smokes
Daily 92 26
3 to 6 times weekly 80 42
1 to 2 times weekly 40 55
1 to 4 times monthly 14 36
Less than monthly 11 45
The logistics of continued heavy use implies, and even demands, selling. The heavy
marijuana user invariably keeps a supply, and many only occasional smokers do as well.
The more that one smokes, the greater is the likelihood that one will have a supply. Not
one of the twenty-six daily smokers said that they did not have a supply of marijuana (see
Keeping a Supply of Marijuana by
"Do you generally keep a supply of marijuana
around your house?"a
Daily 85 0 26
3 to 6 times weekly 64 21 42
1 to 2 times weekly 54 28 54
1 to 4 times monthly
29 41 34
Less than monthly 11 79 38
a All other replies aside from "yes" and "no" eliminated from table.
It is characteristically the case that even heavy marijuana smokers will not be able to
use up, within a brief space of time, the quantities that they purchase. Often a sale will be
on a basis of "take it or leave it." An available quantity might be an ounce, in which case
none of it will be sold, or a pound, or a kilogram, in which case most of it will be sold.
(8 of 18)4/15/2004 1:08:20 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 10
The only way the marijuana user can limit his transactions and his exposure to arrest is to
purchase large amounts. By buying a pound at the near-wholesale price of $120, and
selling twelve ounces to twelve friends at ten dollars for each ounce, one thereby has four
ounces free. "Free grass" is an inducement for selling.
On the surface, the parallel with the heroin addict might seem striking: each sells to
support the habit, getting nothing else out of it. Yet, even if the marijuana seller smokes
five joints a day, an enormous quantity, he would consume a pound every six months,
which means that his habit costs about fifty cents a day, at the most. We are forced,
therefore, to discard the "support the habit" expl
Razdan and J
, Pieds De Cannabis Stockholm, Sweden, September,
Cannabis upgraded to class b due to health fears - mirror co uk cartoons celebrities college comment back days days - hump day days - week days - weekend here is how to use this cannabis myspace comment image copy the above code by right. Cannabis exodus oil recipe search results. Cannabis myspace comment picture mynicespace.com one of the famous movie track, pirates of the cannabis movie funny cool stuff pictures cartoons celebrities cool stuff general illusions kids military people political. Live search cannabis cartoons some anti-prohibition cartoons from prohibition i to read more about the victims prohibition ii, see hr95.org in memory of civilian casualties of the drug war. Cartoonstock - political cartoons and editorial cartoons art deco bats blocks bold bolts bong bubbly cannabis cartoons creepy decorative disclaimer all the fonts listed on this website are user-submitted and are. s and disadvantages.
The first thing you should know is that indoor lights produce
bigger flowers (more bud) than natural window light. This means you
get more THC quantity with artificial lights than you will with natural
sunlight indoors. Even in countries that have hot sun for 6 months of
the year you can still find it hard to produce big buds indoors under
natural light. Some people have grown plants under an attic window
that they open during the dry days. This will grow you bud but not as
much as you would get using an artificial light system. The other side
of the coin is that natural light is free, electricity is not and grow lights
are a little bit expensive to buy and use. They are definitely not as
expensive as it is to run an electric cooker 24 hours a day but they are
little expensive to use all the same.
Figure 3.10 - The Sun. Picture by Inf3cted.
When using a window grow try to place your plant near a
window that gets the most sunlight. Sun comes up in east and sets in
the west. It travels more north or south depending on which side of the
equator you are. Think about it for awhile. Also remember that you
have the seasons to think about. If you plan on a window grow try to
establish when you want your plant to receive most of its light. You
want your plant to get most of its light during flowering. If July is the
best month for sunlight then you may consider producing your
seedling back in April or May or even as early as late March. Try to
guess when you will get the best weather. Coordinate this with the
flowering times directed by the breeder and you will be able to foresee
your harvest time.
Also remember that people can look up and see your plant if
they are sitting near the window. Do people come to wash your
windows? Also remember that if you have a Sativa plant then they will
get big. Take all these factors into consideration when you are growing
your plants with natural sunlight indoors.
If you are growing indoors then you may have a room or part
of a room that you wish to use such as an attic, closet, basement, spare
bathroom or hot press. These locations nearly always need artificial
light. You may even decide to build a cabinet yourself. There are many
ways to set-up an indoor grow room. We will discuss this later in
Figure 3.11 - Indoor Grow room. Picture by Kryptonite.
GENERAL OUTDOOR GROWING AND GUERRILLA
Outdoor growing is growing on your own property outdoors.
Guerrilla farming is growing away from your property in public areas
or on someone else’s property. For this part we will talk a bit about
Figure 3.12 - Outdoor Grow. Picture by Mullummadman.
The biggest problem with outdoor growing is keeping your
grow area secure and private. Some people will rip-off your plant in a
second if they see what you have (Figures 3.13 and 3.14). Others will
just create trouble for you. Security is vital. I once heard about a small
hippy communi Fahrenholtz, M I grew Kali Mist ancestral stock in the early 80's in Oakland and those plants matured in late November, and
into December. The looser, somewhat feathery buds of Kali Mist would present a problem for indoor growers
looking for weighty buds. Despite these shortcomings, I liked it very much -it was my favorite high- and if I
were to grow for personal stash, I would grow Kali." -Mel Franc, High Times Magazine, May 1997 These were separated and the assignment of an o-conflguration
to the endocyclic epoxides in 155 and 156 was established 8
An entirely different approach, which utilized a Diels-Alder reaction on an
appropriately substituted cinnamic acid derivative(Chart 1
Shayana Cannabis -- Saturday, May 26, 2018 12:00:51 PM
Petrzilka, W Dalzell, and R ced with many fruits, but because of the strength of the crystals - the
only real taste goes hand in hand with the expectorant effects of the THC. You better try it for yourself. Smell:
A strong pungency first hits you, then follows a sour sweetness with the final whiff ... turning sweet. If a plant
could have a strong body odour then the White Widow needs a deodorant. Visuals: If you have ever seen a
green plant grown in a snowfall then that's it. It has a dense covering of the sort of hairy crystals we all craving
for. Touch: If you manage to touch this plant without sticking to the leaves or stem then you probably did not
grow it properly. It has intense crystal formation that needs to be touched to be believed! Stone: After the first
puff, that daunting warm feeling of impending stoniess comes over you. You feel it just under your eyes and
throughout your body in time. It is a serious heavy highness. Family Heritage: Originally the union came from
a Brazilian and an Indian - Suffice to say the combination is 60: 40 sativa to indica ratio. – Green House Seed
"Vegetative Time: At least 2 to 4 weeks if on Bio. On Hydro it is only recommended to grow it for 2 weeks.
Flowering Time: On both mediums it is suggested to flower (12 hour light) the White Widow for 8 weeks, but 10
weeks will really give you the crystals you are after. We suggest the final 2 weeks of the flowering cycle to turn
the lights off altogether - or at least down to 8 hours. This keeps the flowers from regrowth and stresses the
plant into giving up its last drop of goodness as crystal to protect the flower...try it! Achievements: 1st Place -
BIO - HTCC - Award 1995.” – Green House Seed Co. catalog"
"“The most rewarded variety of recent years in Holland. The plants are white with THC glands, even on big parts
of the fan leaves. A very soft smoke and great high. Very potent.
Specifications: ~ Flower: 8 weeks ~ Harvest: end of Oct.” – Dutch Passion seedbank catalog"
"“It is a serious heavy high. Heritage: Originally the union came from a Brazilian and an Indian. Suffice to say
the combination is 60% Sativa to 40% Indica. The most rewarded variety of recent years in Holland. The plants
are white of THC-glands, even on big parts of the fan leaves. A very soft smoke and great ""High"". Very potent.
1st place winner 8th Cannabis Cup. 1st place winner 8th international Hydroponic Cup. A compact, medium
height, Indica dominated variety with a sweet 'Skunky' high. Incredibly resinous with profuse white, crystallized
flowering heads. Delicious odor and taste.
Flowering period 8-10 weeks for crystals (50-60 days), outside 10-14 weeks.
Height: Height: inside: 60-75 cm, outside 1.50-2.00m
Yield: up to 150 gr.
Harvest time under natural light: End of October.
Appearance: very strong plant with big leaves.” – Sensi Seedbank catalog"
"“This fabled bio probably derives its name from its whitish appearance creat Williams, S a private seed
stash of their own.
Figure 2.6 - This is some Skunk#1 by Strawdog.
Figure 2.7 - Seeds enough to grow a 1000 plants! Picture by
Figure 2.8 - This is another great picture of some female bud by
This is important to bear in mind before you grow your weed.
Have you got the time to take care of your plants? Are you going to be
taking long holidays? Have you got someone you trust to take care of
your plants? And if you do how secure is your grow area? How do the
people you live with feel about this? Can you hide the smell when the
plants start to flower? Are you prepared to pay money on lights and
other grow items? Are you prepared to pay the costs of a higher
electricity bill? Are people going to see your grow room? Are people
going to walk past your grow site outdoors? Is the meter man going to
see your grow room? Is the gas man going to see your grow room? Are
you sure that you really want to do this?
Figure 2.9 - This is an example of how some outdoor plants can get
really big and tall. Sometimes they can be hard to hide. Picture by
If you are negative on any of these points above then I suggest
that you resolve those issues before you move on.
The next thing I am going to tell you is the most important
thing you will ever hear when growing marijuana. People have lived
their whole lives growing cannabis and have never had an encounter
with the law. It is so simple, but very hard to do. If you can do it then
you are halfway to being an expert grower. Are you ready for it?
NEVER TELL ANYONE THAT YOU ARE GROWING
If you do this then you will never have a problem other than
someone accidentally walking into your grow area. NEVER EVER
TELL ANYONE ANYTHING, EVER. If you can do this then you will
have more security than a castle equipped with guard-dogs henchmen
and the works. Loose lips cause 99.9% of all security related issues
being breached. 00.1% is caused because you did not take the time out
to conceal your area well enough. Loose lips sink ships.
If you plan to share your crop with your friends then do it by
another means, like - ‘Hey guys look what I just bought’. The only
people who should know that you grow are the people who live with
you. If your husband/wife has loose lips, then maybe you should
consider guerrilla growing outdoors (explained later.) Other than that,
these are the most important factors you need to consider. Never grow
at home if other people are not going to know about it. This is bad and
always causes problems in the end. So what does that say? Growing on
your own is the best way. Growing with other people is a problem
unless you know they are okay with it. You will have to figure some of
these things out for yourself.
The next factor is bugs and pests. Always, always have a
bottle of pesticide that kills SPIDER MITES. Spider Mites can reduce
your plants to garbage wit ir stance
is a possible one out of several competing versions, and that all of these versions "surpass
experience," that is, are based on attitudes that are sentiments and values which cannot be
either supported or refuted scientifically. It follows from these expectations of society that
the physician will act in a manner society defines as "responsible," that is, he will make
essentially protective pronouncements.
Let us assume something true that is false, namely that it has been established
scientifically that the statistical chance of experiencing a "psychotic episode" while under
the influence of marijuana is one in a thousand—or even one in a million. This is, we will
(2 of 25)4/15/2004 1:04:59 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 5
assume, a fact on which all observers agree. (It is not, of course.) The manner in which the
physician makes his decision, that is, to be "responsible," will lead him to decide that this
is too great a price for society to pay for the luxury of allowing a small freedom, and
therefore marijuana use ought to be prohibited. Someone with a different set of values
would make the decision in a very different way. The civil libertarian would say that the
incidence of danger is sufficiently small to offset the larger threat to society's freedom to
smoke marijuana. Both may agree on the facts, but it is the sentiments, even among the
physicians, that ultimately decide.
The ideas of physicians are "special" in a second sense as well: doctors have been
successful in defining the nature of reality for the rest of society in a vast number of areas.
They have been successful in claiming that they alone are competent to interpret the
reality of marijuana, and that their version of the drug's actions is the only legitimate,
valid, and objective one. They have managed, that is, to establish epistemological
hegemony. Their position enables their special version of the nature of the drug and its use
to be regarded by others as neutral, impartial, and objectively true, and all other versions
to be biased and based on special interest pleading. The physician is seen as transcending
the accidental and irrational prejudices that blind others. In the area of drug use,
physicians are "instant experts," knowledgeable and unbiased.
Since most members of society are not aware of professional and scientific distinctions,
they will make little effort to seek out the word of those physicians who are most qualified
to speak and write on marijuana, that is, those physicians who have actually done studies
themselves, or who have closely read such studies. In fact, it might very well be
disadvantageous to publicize the views of those physicians who are best-informed on the
effects of marijuana, because they will present a more complex view, one which does not
square with official morality. The contrary, in fact, will be true: the public will encourage
those physicians whose views are most hostile to marijuana u ul differences in the nature of their answers should obtain
among different kinds of marijuana smokers. For instance, do men and women react to the
drug, or report acting to the drug, in the same way, or are there systematic differences
between the sexes? Curiously, our data suggest small and not very enlightening
differences between men and women in their descriptions of the marijuana high. They
both give the same average number of characteristics describing the high—about ten per
person. And for each effect, the proportion of men and women who proffered it is about
54/46—the ratio of men to women respondents answering this question. The only pattern
that significantly departs from this is in the realm of adverse reactions. Although for both
men and women the effects which the subject and an outside observer of any ideological
persuasion would describe as pleasant heavily outweigh the unpleasant, women seem to
be more likely to mention unpleasant characteristics in their description of the high.
This pattern holds true, for instance, with feeling paranoid; less than 10 percent of the
men included paranoia as one description of their drug experience, while this was true of
21 percent of the women. Women were also more likely to report sometimes feeling
depressed (6 percent for men, 15 percent for women), introverted (16 percent vs. 30
percent), or a sense of depersonalization, being cut off from themselves (8 percent vs. 16
percent). In short, women seemed to dominate the negative responses.
Differential involvement with the drug might also be expected to yield differential
responses. Strangely, the heavy marijuana smoker (who used the drug at least three times
per week) gave the same number of average characteristics describing the high as did the
more infrequent user (smoking less than once per week). Adverse reactions were slightly
higher for the infrequent user, but the differences were small, although consistent.
Contrariwise, the more the respondent smoked, the greater was his attribution of favorable
characteristics to the marijuana high.
Aside from three effects—the feeling that everything seems funnier while high, the
sense that time is moving slowly, and the impairment of memory, as well as the sex
findings which we mentioned—no strong differences of any kind emerged from the
interviews outside of the pleasant-unpleasant orbit. In these three, the less frequent smoker
gave them more emphasis as a valid description of the high; yet for even these, the
differences were never over l0 or 12 percent. What is so striking about these descriptions,
then, is the relative consistency of descriptions, the sameness in the qualities chosen to
describe the marijuana experience; the variations are always minimal in comparison with
It is possible that our differentiation between the less than weekly smokers and those
who used the drug at least three times per week is not sufficiently sharp to capture
Brine, Abst 19
of Petrzilka's procedure (Chart 1 It was with this background that at the time we had indicated
both the structures for cannabicyclol in the absence of definite proof such as now
provided by X-ray Started with 10 seeds, all 10 germinated and sprouted. Had 6 females and 4 males with this variety all but one
practically identical. They grew and looked like clones from the same Ma and they grew well. No males were
kept after indicating sex, probably a mistake. This variety was a pleasant surprise with yield and especially
buzz, what a buzz.
Of the 6 females 5 of them were just about identical in growth both during veg and flowering. They had leaves
somewhere between the indica dark and sativa light green with midsize width blades. The one loner plant
showed its differences during flowering. While the majority had bud covering most of the stem this one grew
nuggets at the nodes, thick tight ones.
Because they were so similar in growth just three were kept to be grown from clones. They were all worthy
mothers though. As a matter of fact if you had to or wanted to do a seed crop from plants grown out in Jr. as of
now these would be a better choice than even my favorite the NL x Shiva because of the uniformity. NL x Shiva
also from Posi 4
+ 23 + 15 + 18
1 + +
2 1I"-trans-THC 23 15 iso-THC 18 iso-THC
Chart 1 128 The analog 240 126 was obtained from
237 on treatment with dimethylaminopropyl chloride in the presence of butyllithium